Hiring teams spend weeks on assessment and then discover at the offer stage that the candidate and the company are not close on pay. Everyone is disappointed, time has been lost, and the company concludes that the candidate was not serious. Often the problem began much earlier and had little to do with seriousness.
Pay is a signal, not just a number
A senior candidate reads an offer as a statement about how the company sees the role. A figure well below expectations suggests the company has misjudged the job, or does not value it. A figure that is acceptable but arrives after a long, uncertain process suggests disorganisation. Either way, candidates make a judgement about the company, and they make it before they decide whether the money is enough.
Where the gap comes from
There are several common sources. The company has set a budget from its own pay structure without looking at what the market expects for the scope of the role. The scope itself has grown during the process, so the role being discussed is now larger than the one the budget was built for. The company and the candidate mean different things by compensation, one thinking of base pay and the other of the whole package, including variable pay, benefits and any commitments around the move. Or the candidate has been reluctant to state a number, and the company has avoided asking.
Silence about pay early in a process is not politeness. It is a risk that both sides are carrying.
What good practice looks like
Talk about the range early and openly, and with the real decision-maker in mind. A company that knows its range, and is prepared to explain how it was set, finds it easier to discuss. A candidate who is told early whether the role can reach what they expect can decide whether to continue.
Separate the components. Discuss base pay, variable pay, benefits and any other elements as parts of one package, so that both sides are comparing like with like.
Check the scope against the budget. If the role has changed during the process, reopen the budget decision before an offer, not after a refusal.
Be willing to explain the reasoning. Senior people usually accept constraints that are explained honestly. They are less patient with ones that are not.
When the answer is no
Sometimes the gap is real and cannot be closed. The right response is to say so early and part on good terms. A candidate who has been treated honestly will often remain a friend of the company and may be a future hire. One who has been taken to the end of the process and then disappointed will not.
An uncomfortable question for the company
If strong candidates repeatedly decline, the company should ask whether its pay position for senior roles is realistic, whether its process is too slow, and whether the role itself is clearly defined. The answer is sometimes about pay and often about something else that pay is being asked to compensate for.
Thinking about this in your own business?
Talk to Catalyx about Executive Search